Sep 20, 2020

C3g Phono preamplifier Part 1

A while ago browsing the web to enrich my knowledge, I stumbled on a phono schematic around the C3g. Well known in the hobbyist world and a must try for many, this tube just average in triode mode is a real champion as a pentode.

I discovered these great qualities while seeking a first stage tube for my LCR phono stage. Sound was really involving, but gain was too high for comfortable listening in my setup and I did not persevere in that direction until today.

 

The scheme I found from Intact audio forum, is very simple, but I noticed a few design mistakes that will surely affect the final result. A weird RIAA network and a rather high output impedance. Both easily fixed. 

Network is passive and when properly calculated can give a very accurate correction.   In that way the best is to follow Lipschitz 1979 publication. To make it short we have to keep in mind that network is dependent upon first stage Zout, second stage input resistance Zin and Miller’s input capacitance Cin. This last point is often neglected and a reason why you cannot change tubes without modifying network time constants.

Now, components calculation is easier. We just have to write down all we need.

 

 1 – Time constants

                                            R’1C1 = 2187 µS 

                                            R’1C’2 = 750 µS 

                                            R2C1 = 318 µS 

                                            C1 // C’2 = 2,916 

 2 – Components value 

                                            R’1 = ( Zout + R1 ) // Zin 

                                            Zin ~ 50 Zout 

                                           C’2 = C2 + Cin 


First stage gain, Zout and bandwidth

A pentode gain is merely equal to tube Gm by load. If we want to keep second stage input resistance in a reasonable value (~ 500K), C3g load have to be something like 10/15K to respect Lipschitz recommendations.

A graphical study will help find the best operating point and I finally stopped on 12K@10mA. Gain will be very close to 150 and Zout 11,6K assuming a 400K internal resistance. Rg2 (Zin) can either be 510K or 560K depending upon RIAA resistors availability. These have to be 1% or closer tolerance.

To keep gain high G2 is fully decoupled to the lowest frequencies. As a bonus, decoupling dramatically reduces the grid-anode capacitance. Effect on bandwidth is a huge improvement, with high frequencies well above 10Mhz. To prevent any unwanted oscillation it is necessary to use a grid stopper close to G1 pin.

Second stage gain and Zout

I did not go with a 5687 like in the original design. Amplification factor is too low and this tube needs a lot of mA to sound right.

Because gain of a standard phono preamp is about 300/350 or +50dB, I have to find a tube with at least a gain of 20 to compensate RIAA network insertion loss (-20dB @ 1KHz). After much thought to decide if I should use a high µ triode with degenerative feedback or a classic medium µ anode follower, I stopped on the great sounding E182CC fully bypassed.

With a µ of 24, a low internal resistance and quite a high Gm (15mA/V), it is a good G3g companion. Moreover, the second triode will make a nice shared current coupled stage. I used this topology in the E88C/E86CC LCR phono preamp with great satisfaction.

Output impedance will be about ρ/µ+1 (~65Ω). This is far better than the 4K of the original design and will allow good frequencies transmission even with long cables. 

 

preamp schematic 

 

more to come...

7 comments:

  1. Hi Fred,
    Glad to see you keep blogging.
    Always nice insights.
    Did you build this preamp as here described?
    Care to comment about the results?

    Thanks!
    Best regards,
    Maxime

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Maxime, Thank you for being an avid reader. I never publish a scheme that have not been tested electrically and sonically. This preamp is my daily companion for more than a month and I must admit it is the one I prefer over the 3 I have, even the LCR one. It has the kick that lack the two others but overall it gives a very crisp restitution to music. I actually work on a dedicated supply and it will the detailed in a future post along with a report of my listening.
      Regards
      Fred

      Delete
  2. Another, maybe stupid question: you speak of a constant current loaded section for the cathode follower. But I don't see any constant current source or sink on the last triode. Am I missing something?
    Regards,
    Maxime

    PS: I am tempted to build this phono preamp. Seems much more simple and stable than the folded cathode one I started working on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Maxime, this is a constant current coupling stage, both stages (AF & CF) share the same supply and current flows equally in each tube remembering that a CF stage is non inverting. IMHO it is worth trying because effective cost is low compared to the LCR and quality is amazing.
      Regards
      Fred

      Delete
    2. Forgot to say current remains mostly constant due to class A operation

      Delete
  3. Bonjour Fred,
    félicitation à nouveau !
    Je suis très tenté par ce schéma (j'ai déjà un phono RIAA RCA, à base de 6SL7 et 6J5 en sortie).
    Je me suis amusé à calculer pour votre phono C3G les valeurs des capas et R pour ceux qui n'ont pas de stocks anciens, avec des modèles existants (de l'excellente marque Amtrans, que j'ai adopté sur mon phono actuel). Les R carbone amagnétiques sont remarquables (et abordables), tout comme leurs capas polypro AMCH, mieux meilleures que des silver mica précédemment utilisées. Pour la 50K d'entrée, j'ai découvert que les Audio Note tantale amagnétiques (nouvelle fabrication) sont superbe musicalement (au contraire des anciennes tantales que je n'aimais pas), particulièrement en fuite de grille.

    Valeurs capas RIAA (Amtrans AMCO + AMCH)

    36 nano (36 000pf) = 0,033uf (33 000pf) // 1500pf // 1500pf
    12,3 nano (12 300pf) = 0,01uf (10 000pf) // 2200pf // 100pf (= 12,32 nano)

    Valeurs résistances RIAA (Amtrans AMRT carbone)

    57,6K = 560K // 180K // 100K

    8,86K = 22K // 27K // 33K

    Si cela peut aider quelques amateurs tentés par cet excellent schéma...

    Bien cordialement.
    Bruno



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bonjour Bruno et merci de suivre mes perigrinations tubesques. Ce preamp a de remarquables aptitudes avec une dynamique qui s'approche du Pultec RC. Le rendu tonal me semble assez juste mais dans un domaine aussi subjectif il faut rester prudent. J'apprecie les informations sur les composants a utiliser, pour ma part je peux t' adresser les capas polystyrène Philips si intéressé. Merci de me faire part de ton ressenti lorsqu'il sera réalisé. Cordialement
      Fred

      Delete